POWER-PAK C.E. - Continuing Education for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians

Benefits of Probiotics in the Management of Gastrointestinal Disorders


Marketed products containing probiotics have become widely available during the last several years. The popularity of probiotic-containing foods and dietary supplements has steadily increased as more people seek ways to maintain their health. Probiotics are not new; they have been available for a long time. The term probiotic, a term derived from the Greek language, means for life and was first introduced in the 1960s. Today, however, the large number of probiotic formulations added to various foods and supplements may be overwhelming to consumers. Further, the role of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of medical conditions may not be well understood among the health care community or the public.

There is a growing body of basic science and clinical trial data supporting the use of probiotics. These agents are effective for a variety of medical indications, including gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the prevention of adverse GI effects from chemotherapy/radiation and antibiotic use, infant nutrition, and respiratory conditions.1-5 Questions arise regarding differences among the available probiotic formulations and how these agents should be properly prescribed, dosed, stored, and administered. The pharmacist is well-positioned to provide consumers with information about probiotics, so the most appropriate product may be selected according to the evidence-based research.

Awareness of Probiotics and Medical Foods

It has been within this century only that the concept of useful microbes has become accepted in the health care industry and only within the past decade that probiotics has become a term familiar to both health care providers and the public.6 Probiotics have been used in Europe for decades, but have been widely introduced to the United States during the past 10 years. Other than the general awareness that probiotics contain good bacteria and are added to food and supplements, most people may not have useful knowledge of what probiotics are, what they do, who should take them, and why.7,8

What Are Probiotics?

Probiotics are live microorganisms that provide a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts.9 Probiotics can be formulated into many different types of products, including foods, drugs, and dietary supplements. Species of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are most commonly used as probiotics. However, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and some Escherichia coli and Bacillus bacteria species are also used as probiotics. Many probiotics are lactic acid bacteria (LAB). LABs have been used to preserve food through fermentation for thousands of years. LABs can serve as agents for food fermentation, while also having the potential to impart health benefits as probiotics. LABs are defined as a functional classification of nonpathogenic, nontoxigenic, gram-positive, fermentative bacteria that produce lactic acid from carbohydrates.10 LABs include the Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus thermophilus species. Because Bifidobacterium is not associated with food fermentation, it is not grouped with LABs although it is a probiotic.

Several related terms may be confused with probiotics. They are prebiotic, synbiotic, and postbiotic. These terms are defined in Table 1.

Table 1. Definitions
Probiotic Live microorganism when administered in adequate amounts confers a health benefit on the host.
Prebiotic Nondigestible substance that provides a beneficial physiological effect for the host by selectively stimulating the favorable growth or activity of a limited number of indigenous bacteria. Common examples include: oligofructose, inulin, galacto-oligosaccharides, and lactulose.
Synbiotic Product that contains both probiotics and prebiotics.
Postbiotic A metabolic byproduct generated by a probiotic organism that influences the host’s biological functions.


Prebiotics stimulate the growth and/or activity of the body’s indigenous bacteria, or microbiota. They consist primarily of nonstarch polysaccharides and oligosaccharides that are poorly digested by human enzymes. Most prebiotics are used as food ingredients and some are found naturally in foods, such as oligofructose, which is in wheat, onions, bananas, honey, garlic, and leeks. Prebiotics can be isolated from chicory root as well. Chicory root is part of some commercial probiotic combination formulations. The mechanisms of action for prebiotics include increasing bifidobacteria in the colon, calcium absorption, fecal weight, and shortening GI transit time.10

The Human Microbiota

Microbiota refers to the population of microscopic organisms that inhabit a particular organ or portion of a person’s body.5 When an adequate amount of normal gut microbiota are present in the GI tract, they aid digestion, reduce the colonization of harmful bacteria and help the GI mucosal defenses, boosting the immune system. Intestinal microbiota benefit human health by forming a mucosal barrier with the intestinal mucosa and mucus, creating an important defense system against infection.5 The population of microbiota increases in the GI tract, from the stomach to the colon, as acid, bile, and pancreatic excretions decrease: The number of microbes at the small intestine’s end is estimated at 106 to 107 colony forming units (CFUs); in the colon, the number of microbes increases to between 1011 and 1012 CFUs/mL of intestinal contents.11 Recent genome analyses have confirmed the presence of over 1000 different bacterial species in the microbiota, although 30 to 40 species account for the vast majority of the microbiota.5

The human intestinal microbiota and mucosa are part of a complex system that contributes to immune system function, including oral tolerance and immunity. About two-thirds of the body’s immune cells are estimated to be in the intestinal mucosa. Each individual has a unique bacterial fingerprint, but a core group of about 57 bacteria are common to all.5 A person’s microbiota is influenced by gender and age, as well as nutritional and health status. Intestinal microbes can be affected by factors such as antibiotic use and immunosuppression. In most individuals, the microbiota returns to normal without intervention and after a period of time.

How Probiotics Work

Probiotics are thought to benefit the GI tract by reestablishing the balance between good and bad bacteria.6 Probiotic effect varies by the bacterial strain, the dose ingested, host-related factors, and the food vector.5 There are differences in how probiotic species withstand gastric acid and colonize the intestinal tract.

Probiotics are thought to act through several mechanisms of action, including the following5:

A recently published evidence-based review of probiotics and health noted the consumption of probiotics and their influence on microbiota composition may “contribute significantly to human health and well-being.”5 The researchers note that probiotic intake must be prolonged over time to be effective. The dose of probiotics is measured in CFUs. To gain a high enough concentration in the small and large intestines, probiotic concentrations should be ≥ 106 to 108 CFUs, although scientific basis is somewhat weak. There is also no scientific evidence that 2 or more probiotic strains ingested together will produce a synergistic effect in humans.5

A probiotic strain is identified by the genus, species, and an alphanumeric designation. In the scientific community, there is an agreed nomenclature for microorganisms—for example, Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. The most commonly used probiotic organisms are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Commonly Used Probiotic Strains10
Lactobacillus Bifidobacterium Other
L acidophilus LA-5 B animalis lactis Bb-12 Bacillus cereus
L acidophilus NCFM B animalis DN 173 010 Enterococcus faecalisa
L bulgaricus B bifidum CUL20 Enterococcus faeciuma LAB SF68
L casei DN-114 001 B breve Yakult Escherichia coli Nissle 1917
L casei CRL431 B breve Bb99 Streptococcus thermophilus
L casei F19 B infantis 35624 Saccharomyces boulardii lyo (yeast)
L casei Lbc80r B lactis HN019  
L johnsonii La1 B longum BB536  
L lactis L1A B clausii  
L plantarum 299V    
L reuteri ATTC55730    
L rhamnosus GG    
L rhamnosus LC705    

Evidence of Probiotics Effectiveness and Safety

A growing body of preclinical and clinical data supports the use of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of a large variety of medical conditions. Some conditions for which probiotic studies have shown promising results include the following5:

These studies support the safety of probiotics, even at very high doses. However, the majority of clinical data have been in circulation for fewer than 5 years ; similarly, preclinical animal studies have been conducted only within the last few decades. Recent articles and meta-analyses of probiotics stress that there is a lack of clinical trials specifically designed to test probiotic safety.19 The majority of information about safety has been obtained from individual case reports. Published reviews note inconsistency in testing methods and a wide variation in doses, duration of therapy, and outcomes measurements used. They call for additional research to determine the best regimens by using specific probiotic strains for specific patient groups, over longer intervals, with more comparative studies.6 In addition, the effects described in the studies can only be attributed to the strain or strains tested and not to the species or the whole group of LABs or other probiotics. Therefore, the safety of probiotics is related to their intended use, the dose and treatment duration, and the potential patient vulnerability.

Probiotics are unique because they are alive when administered and they could have the potential for infectivity or toxin production.28 Probiotics may theoretically be responsible for the following 4 types of side effects20:

There have been rare reports of systemic infections and probiotic consumption among patients with underlying medical conditions or preexisting infections.9 Saccharomyces boulardii has been associated with a few cases of sepsis, although contaminated IV lines may have been a factor.21

Because of these reports, care should be taken when administering probiotics to immunocompromised patients or patients with chronic diseases, since there is limited information regarding safety for use in these populations. A recently published review of one meta-analysis and several randomized controlled trails (RCTs) involving probiotic use among pregnant women in the third trimester conclude no increases in adverse fetal outcomes. These data indicate probiotic use does not appear to pose any safety concerns for pregnant and lactating women; however, there were no published studies addressing the use of Saccharomyces species. Reviewers also note probiotics are unlikely to be transferred into breast milk.22 Probiotics are being widely used in infant formulas. During an infant’s first few weeks of life, the education of its immune system results from the exposure to breast milk and bacteria, both dietary and potentially pathogenic. Supplementation with probiotics is generally considered safe; however, studies have not yet compared the health benefits of breastfeeding with those of infant formula plus probiotics products.5

Probiotics are generally well tolerated. Abdominal discomfort, flatulence, and bloating are the most common side effects; they tend to occur early in use and are self-limiting.23

Probiotics for the Treatment of GI Disorders

GI disorders for which probiotics have been shown to be beneficial include irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC).


IBS is a chronic GI condition with common symptoms, which include abdominal cramping or pain and bloating and gassiness, as well as altered bowel habits (e.g., diarrhea and/or constipation or both). IBS is divided into the following 3 subcategories: IBS with constipation (IBS-C), where patients have hard stools more than 25% of the time and loose stools less than 25% of the time; IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), in which patients have loose stools more than 25% of the time and hard stools less than 25% of the time; and mixed/alternating (IBS-M), in which patients have intermittent periods of diarrhea and constipation.

IBS is one of the most common conditions recorded in primary practice and the most frequent reason for seeing a gastroenterologist. IBS has a population-wide prevalence of 14%, predominantly among women24; its prevalence is approximately equal among the 3 types. Patients with IBS were estimated to have made 3.6 million physician visits annually, resulting in a financial expenditure of $1.35 billion direct and $205 million indirect costs in the United States.25 While IBS was once generally believed to be caused by or exacerbated by stress, organic and potentially postinfectious etiologies have recently come to light.26 Symptoms have also been attributed to possible alterations in the intestinal microbiota and elevated levels of cytokines.27

A number of studies have described the clinical utility of probiotics for patients with IBS; specifically, Kim et al observed reduced abdominal bloating and reduced flatulence3,28 in placebo-controlled trials involving a high-potency probiotic. In the first study, 25 patients with IBS-D were randomly assigned to receive VSL#3 powder (450 billion lyophilized bacteria/day) or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. Pre- and posttreatment GI transit measurements were performed in all patients. Results showed abdominal bloating was reduced (P = 0.046) in the VSL#3 treatment group. VSL#3 had no effect on the following symptoms: abdominal pain, gas, and urgency. All patients tolerated VSL#3 well. In the second RCT, 48 patients with Rome II IBS were randomized to receive VSL# 3 twice daily (31 patients received 4 weeks and 17 patients 8 weeks of treatment). Treatment with VSL# 3 was associated with reduced flatulence during the entire treatment period (P = 0.011).

Improvements in the symptoms of IBS were shown in a meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials; although there is a continuing need for trials of a longer duration.28 The review found methodological problems, including differences in probiotic strain, doses, duration of therapy, and outcomes measured, in many of the trials. Almost all probiotic combinations contained both bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. In single-organism studies, lactobacilli do not appear to confer a health benefit to patients with IBS. When used in combination with bifidobacteria, lactobacilli did not hinder the reduction of IBS symptoms. The bifidobacteria appear to be the active ingredient in probiotic formulations and the systematic review shows formulations containing bifidobacteria are more effective. This was also the conclusion of another meta-analysis involving 16 RCTs, with specific reference to Bifidobacterium infantis 35624, which is thought to increase the ratio of certain interleukins.29 B infantis 35624 was shown to significantly improve both global and individual IBS symptoms without an increase in adverse events.

IBD (UC, Pouchitis, Crohn’s Disease)

IBD is characterized by chronic inflammation in the intestinal tract; it includes 2 serious and potentially life-threatening diseases, UC (which affects primarily the colon and rectum) and Crohn’s disease (which can impact any portion of the GI tract). These conditions alternate between periods of remission and exacerbations. During exacerbations, the patient may develop fistulas and the risk of losing portions of the intestinal tract.30 Patients with IBD have an increased risk of developing colon cancer. Symptoms include abdominal cramping, bloody diarrhea, nausea, and fever. UC complications may include bleeding from deep ulcerations and severe abdominal bloating. Potential complications from Crohn’s disease may include intestinal blockage from swelling and scar tissue, accompanied by cramping pain, vomiting, and bloating, as well as ulcers in the intestinal tract that may develop into fistulas. About one-third of patients with Crohn’s disease experience infected fistulas. Eventually, nearly one-quarter of the patients with UC and three-quarters of the patients with Crohn’s disease will require surgery.30

Annual health care costs attributable to IBD annually in the United States are more than $1.7 billion, making it one of the 5 most prevalent GI disease burdens. IBD accounts for more than 700,000 physician visits, 100,000 hospitalizations, and disability for 119,000 patients annually.30

Medications used to treat IBD consist of aminosalicylates (5-ASA), steroids, immune modifiers (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate), and antibiotics (metronidazole, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, others). In addition, inflixamab is used for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Drug therapies for IBD have significant side effects and do not result in remission for all patients, thus probiotics could help to fill an important therapeutic need.31

UC: A number of RCTs have been published examining probiotic treatment during the induction and remission of UC. As with many other probiotic trials, the following limitations may have influenced results: the use of different probiotic strains (e.g., milk with Bifidobacteria/Lactobacillus and Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 versus other treatments and VSL#3 versus other treatments); inadequate numbers of study participants (n = 18 to 327); and a short duration of study (1 to 12 months). It is because of these study limitations a Cochrane Database Systematic Review concluded that probiotics, when combined with other therapies, did not improve remission rates; instead, they determined that treatment with probiotics produced a reduction in disease activity for patients with mild-to-moderately severe UC.32 Another systematic review concluded that the efficacy profile between probiotics and anti-inflammatory medications is similar.33 More recent studies have established the following: a 77% remission rate was achieved for a small number of participants with UC who were treated with VSL#3 and who had not responded to conventional therapy34; a 56% remission rate was achieved in pediatric individuals with mild-to-moderate UC (i.e., a combined remission/response rate of 61%)4; a 93% remission rate was achieved for individuals treated with probiotics compared with a 36% remission rate for those participants treated with placebo (both groups received concomitant drug therapy) in an RCT involving children with UC35; and a significantly decreased incidence of UC disease activity, compared with placebo, in a double-blind trial of adults with UC36; as well as a 68% success rate in achieving clinical remission in a small study using a 4-week course of S boulardii.37

These studies support the idea that specific probiotics may be effective for the short-term treatment of patients with UC.

Pouchitis: For patients who have had reconstructive surgery following ileostomy secondary to IBD, inflammation of the ileal pouch anastomosis or pouchitis is a common complication, occurring in up to 50% of patients postsurgery. Decreased levels of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria may contribute to the condition. A number of studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of pouchitis.38-40 The combination product, VSL#3, has provided the best evidence to date of effectiveness in preventing and treating pouchitis. A 2010 meta-analysis concluded that VSL#3 is more effective than placebo for preventing the onset and relapse of pouchitis.41

Crohn’s Disease: The literature is mixed with regard to the use of probiotics as induction therapy or maintenance therapy for patients with Crohn’s disease. Methodological problems exist regarding trials, particularly the small number of participants involved. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have concluded that probiotics were ineffective as maintenance therapy during remission for patients with Crohn’s disease.42

Regulatory Status of Probiotics in the United States

In the United States, probiotics can be regulated as the following: foods, dietary supplements, or foods for special dietary uses (e.g., medicinal foods); drugs (either prescription or nonprescription); medical devices; and cosmetics.43 The categorization of most products is determined on the basis of the following 4 regulatory elements: route of administration, formulation, safety, and the intended use. The probiotics in yogurts, desserts, or beverages are considered food; while those formulated as dietary supplements are in dosage forms specified by law, including powders, tablets, capsules, and drops. A medicinal food is intended for enteral use in the “dietary management of a disease or condition for which distinctive nutritional requirements have been established by medical evaluation” and is formulated to be administered “under the supervision of a physician”. Most probiotics are marketed in the United States as food products or dietary supplements; some, however, are marketed as medicinal foods, such as VSL#3. Marketing probiotics as drugs would be very difficult and costly given they are natural products and because of the rules governing drug development.42 This is why most manufacturers choose to formulate and market probiotics as foods, medicinal foods, or dietary supplements.

Dietary supplements are governed by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994. A dietary supplement is defined as “a product (other than tobacco) that is intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: a vitamin; a mineral; an herb or other botanical; an amino acid; a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total daily intake; or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of those ingredients.”

A dietary supplement may also be referred to as one of the following:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates dietary supplements under provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, as amended by DSHEA. Dietary supplements are broadly presumed to be safe under DSHEA and the FDA does not have the authority to require them to be approved for safety and efficacy before they enter the market. The FD&C Act was amended by the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act of 2006. This Act requires manufacturers to abide by current Good Manufacturing Practices and to notify the FDA about supplement-related serious adverse events, which may be defined as the following: any health-related events that result in, for example, a death, a life-threatening experience, an inpatient hospitalization, or a birth defect, or which require, based on reasonable medical judgment, a medical or surgical intervention to prevent those serious outcomes.

DSHEA also prohibits manufacturers from making disease-related claims about their products. They may only make nutrient-content claims and structure-function claims for dietary supplements. This is the reason most probiotics are labeled very generally; for example, a manufacturer may label its probiotic as one to “help naturally regulate your digestive system,” which is a structure-function claim. Conversely, they would be prohibited from claiming the product reduces UC remission unless they had tested and marketed the probiotic as a drug. This is true even when clinical trials have shown demonstrated effectiveness for the treatment of certain conditions. Because of these DSHEA requirements regarding claims, it can be difficult for consumers to easily access any scientific evidence that might help them to choose a product. The pharmacist, then, becomes a crucial resource for patients.

Probiotic Formulation, Administration, and Storage

A wide variety of probiotic supplements have been marketed and are currently available. Tables 3 and 4 list several probiotic food, medicinal food, and dietary supplement formulations. Probiotic formulations may differ according to the bacterial strain(s) used and the amount of CFUs present. To maximize effectiveness, the probiotic formulation must have a very high bacterial count and must be able to reach the active site of the colon. It has been suggested that concentrations of 106 CFUs/mL in the small intestine and 108 CFUs/gram in the colon are needed, at minimum, for effectiveness; although these concentrations may vary based on intended use.5 In addition, probiotics must be resistant to bile and stomach acids in sufficient number. They must also be able to adhere to mucosa and colonize the GI tract for a substantial period of time.

Table 3. Select Food Probiotics
Probiotics Primary Ingredients
Activia® Yogurt Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Streptococcus thermophilus
Stonyfield® Organic Yogurt Bifidus
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Lactobacillus casei
Streptococcus thermophilus
YoBaby® Yogurt, YoBaby® Meals, YoToddler® Bifidus
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Streptococcus thermophilus
YoKids® Bifidus
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Yo-Plus® With Probiotics Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Streptococcus thermophilus
Adapted from manufacturer Web sites.  

Table 4. Selected Probiotic Medicinal Foods and Supplements
Align® Probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 (bifantis)
Baby’s Only Essentials Probiotic® Bifidobacterium (longum, breve, infantis)
Culturelle® Natural Health and Wellness Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Culturelle® Probiotics for Kids Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Culturelle® Digestive Health Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Culturelle® Dairy Free Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Digestive Advantage® Intensive Bowel Support® Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086
Enzymatic Therapy Pearls IC™ Bifidobacterium (bifidum, lactis, longum, breve)
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
Flora-Q® Bifidobacterium
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus paracasei
Streptococcus thermophilus
Florastor® Saccharomyces boulardii 250 mg
Florastor® Kids Saccharomyces boulardii 250 mg
Lactinex™ Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Philips® Colon Health® Bifidobacterium bifidum
Bifidobacterium longum
Lactobacillus gasseri
Sustenex® Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086
VSL#3® Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus paracasei
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Bifidobacterium breve
Bifidobacterium infantis
Bifidobacterium longum
Streptococcus thermophilus
Combination Products
Digestive Advantage® Daily Constipation Formula® Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086
Konjac glucomannan
Digestive Advantage® Gas Defense Formula® Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086
Endo-cellulase, exo-cellulase, hemicellulase, invertase, alpha-galactosidase
Digestive Advantage® Lactose Defense Formula® Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086
Lactose 3000 FCC units
Individual product Web sites and Lexi-Comp, Inc. (Lexi-Natural Products for Palm OS). Lexi-Comp, Inc.; September 30, 2011.5

Probiotics are most effective when dosed and administered correctly. Dosage is an important consideration and varies widely from product to product: Please note, medicinal food probiotics list dose recommendations according to the severity of the condition being treated. In addition, because probiotics are live organisms, storage and shelf life are important. The number of CFUs at the time of manufacture will decrease over time. A 50% to 90% loss of activity from the time of manufacture until the expiration date, also called the “best by” date, may be expected. Many manufacturers provide only the number of CFUs present when the product was manufacturered, although labeling guidelines recommended otherwise.9

A July 2011 ConsumerLab.com report provides the results of their analysis of 13 probiotic products for human consumption, which revealed that a number of products contained less CFUs than the amount claimed on their labeling. The products analyzed were purchased from retail stores, online venues, and through other commonly used purchasing means. ConsumerLab is an independent provider of test results and information about health-related and nutritional products and may be a worthwhile resource for the pharmacist to consider using.44

Probiotics should be kept refrigerated to help maintain potency. Some products will require refrigeration or temperatures not in excess of room temperature, to maintain viability. For example, VSL#3 must be shipped and stored under refrigeration. The powder formulation can be mixed with cold foods, but cannot be mixed with carbonated beverages.

Since each probiotic formulation may have different strains, potency, storage, and expiration, it is critical to review the product’s label when selecting an appropriate probiotic. The FAO/WHO and WGO recommend each probiotic label contain the following information and adhere to the following guidelines9,10:

In order to guide individuals while they choose probiotics, the pharmacist should be familiar with existing data and the important clinical distinctions of these agents. A number of good Web sites provide information about probiotics.

Select Probiotic Web Site Resources


When advising patients about the use of probiotics, it is critical to evaluate the patient’s specific condition. Each product must be closely evaluated because probiotics are unique based upon strain, formulation, and number of CFUs/dose. The choice to use one particular probiotic instead of another should be based upon evidence gathered from clinical trials and human studies demonstrating the benefit of using the formulation; the pharmacist may have to assist with accessing and interpreting this information. In addition, the recommended dose should be based upon the number of CFUs shown to be effective in clinical studies involving the specific product. Effective use of a probiotic requires continual administration. Expiration dates and storage conditions are important because these factors will affect the efficacy of the product; so, follow packaging instructions when storing these products. Table 55 lists more detailed information about the probiotic products used in a number of the clinical trials investigating treatments for IBS and IBD.


Studies continue to be published in the medical literature, presenting solid evidence that probiotics provide a clinical benefit for patients with GI disorders, including IBS and IBD. Probiotics are uniquely formulated and regulated (including health claims) and this may make selecting an appropriate product difficult for patients seeking advice about probiotic use. The pharmacist should keep up-to-date regarding both the latest research and the effectiveness of various probioticsm as a means to assist patients with selecting products and using them most effectively.


  1. Delia P, Sansotta G, Donato V, et al. Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(6):912-915.
  2. Gionchetti P, Lammers KM, Rizzello F, Campieri M. VSL#3: an analysis of basic and clinical contributions in probiotic therapeutics. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005;34(3):499–513, ix-x.
  3. Kim HJ, Vazquez Roque MI, Camilleri M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a probiotic combination VSL# 3 and placebo in irritable bowel syndrome with bloating. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17(5):687-696.
  4. Huynh HQ, deBruyn J, Guan L, et al. Probiotic preparation VSL#3 induces remission in children with mild to moderate acute ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(5):760-768.
  5. Aureli P, Capurso L, Castellazzi AM, et al. Probiotics and health: an evidence-based review. Pharmacol Res. 2011;63(5):366-376.
  6. Dobrogosz WJ, Peacock TJ, Hassan HM. Evolution of the probiotic concept from conception to validation and acceptance in medical science. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2010;72:1-41.
  7. Senok AC, Ismaeel AY, Botta GA. Probiotics: facts and myths. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(12):958-966.
  8. Zuccotti GV, Meneghin F, Raimondi C, et al. Probiotics in clinical practice: an overview. J Int Med Res. 2008;36 (suppl 1):1A-53A.
  9. Report of a Joint Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Working Group. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food: London, Ontario, Canada: 2002. WHO Web site.www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2011.
  10. World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). WGO Practice Guideline-Probiotics and Prebiotics, October2011. WGO Web site. www.worldgastroenterology.org/probiotics- prebiotics.html. Accessed November 28, 2011.
  11. Tannock GW. Chapter 1: The intestinal microflora. In: Gut Flora, Nutrition, Immunity and Health. Fuller R, Perdigón G, eds. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003:1-23.
  12. McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007;5(5):97-105.
  13. Sazawal S, Hiremath G, Dhingra U, et al. Efficacy of probiotics in prevention of acute diarrhoea: a meta-analysis of masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(6):374-382.
  14. Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S, Bulsara M. Updated meta-analysis of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):921–930.
  15. Allen SJ, Martinez EG, Gregorio GV, Dans LF. Probiotics for treating infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD003048.
  16. Frohmader TJ, Chaboyer WP, Robertson IK, Gowardman J. Decrease in frequency of liquid stool in enterally fed critically ill patients given the multispecies probiotic VSL#3: a pilot trial. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(3):e1-e11.
  17. Bowen JM, Stringer AM, Gibson RJ, Yeoh AS, et al. VSL#3 probiotic treatment reduces chemotherapy-induced diarrhea and weight loss. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6(9):1449-1454.
  18. Dubey AP, Rajeshwari K, Chakravarty A, Famularo G. Use of VSL[sharp]3 in the treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in children: preliminary results. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(suppl 3 Pt 1):S126-S129.
  19. Sanders ME, Akkermans LM, Haller D, et al. Safety assessment of probiotics for human use. Gut Microbes. 2010;1(3):164-185.
  20. Marteau P. Safety aspects of probiotic products. Scand J Nutr. 2001;45:22-242.
  21. Muñoz P, Bouza E, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: an emerging infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1625–1634.
  22. Elias J, Bozza P, Einarson A. Are probiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation? Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(3):299–301.
  23. Kligler B, Cohrssen A. Probiotics. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(9):1073-1078.
  24. Hungin AP, Chang L, Locke GR, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome in the United States: prevalence, symptom patterns and impact. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(11):1365-1375.
  25. Inadomi JM, Fennerty MB, Bjorkman D. Systematic review: the economic impact of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(7):7:671-682.
  26. Ghoshal UC, Ranjan P. Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: the past, the present and the future. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(suppl 3):94-101.
  27. Kim HJ, Camilleri M, McKinzie S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a probiotic, VSL#3, on gut transit and symptoms in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(7):895-904.
  28. Moayyedi P, Ford AC, Talley NJ, et al. The efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Gut. 2010;59(3):325-332.
  29. Brenner DM, Moeller MJ, Chey WD, Schoenfeld PS. The utility of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol.2009;104(4):1033-1039.
  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). CDC Web site. July 15, 2011. www.cdc.gov/ibd/. Accessed November 30, 2011.
  31. Scott FI, Aberra F. VSL#3 for ulcerative colitis: growing evidence? Gastroenterology. 2011;140(5):1685-1686.
  32. Mallon P, McKay D, Kirk S, Gardiner K. Probiotics for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD005573.
  33. Zigra PI, Maipa VE, Alamanos YP. Probiotics and remission of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review. Neth J Med. 2007;65(11): 411–418.
  34. Bibiloni R, Fedorak RN, Tannock GW, et al. VSL#3 probiotic-mixture induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(7):1539-1546.
  35. Miele E, Pascarella F, Giannetti E, et al. Effect of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) on induction and maintenance of remission in children with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):437-443.
  36. Sood A, Midha V, Makharia GK, et al. The probiotic preparation, VSL#3 induces remission in patients with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.2009;7(11):1202-1209, 1209 e1.
  37. Guslandi M, Giollo P, Testoni PA. A pilot trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(6):697–698.
  38. Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Morselli C, et al. High-dose probiotics for the treatment of active pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(12):2075-2082; discussion 2082-2084.
  39. Mimura T, Rizzello F, Helwig U, et al. Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis. Gut. 2004;53(1):108-114.
  40. Turroni S, Vitali B, Candela M, et al. Antibiotics and probiotics in chronic pouchitis: a comparative proteomic approach. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(1):30-41.
  41. Holubar SD, Cima RR, Sandborn WJ, Pardi DS. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2010;(6):CD001176.
  42. Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rahimi F, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for maintenance of remission and prevention of clinical and endoscopic relapse in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(9): 2524–2531.
  43. Hoffman FA. Business considerations in the development of probiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(suppl 2):S141-S143; discussion S144-S151.
  44. ConsumerLab Product Review: Probiotic Supplements for Adults, Children and Pets. Updated 6/21/11. [Subscription required]. ConsumerLab.com Website.https://www.consumerlab.com/howtested/Probiotic_Supplements_Including_Lactobacillus_acid ophilus_Bifidobacterium_and_Others/probiotics/

Back to Top

Return to Activity

Postgraduate Healthcare Education, LLC (PHE) is the source of Power-Pak C.E.® continuing education for health care professionals. Our accredited programs assist in meeting the requirements of licensure. PHE provides continuing education for the broad spectrum of health care professionals. This site features a searchable database of accredited Power-Pak C.E.® courses on important topics for today's health care professionals.

PHE customizes Power-Pak C.E.® online for each visitor by creating a personal participant profile. Registered participants may update their contact information, take an exam, receive instant grading, view their exam history, and print certificates for successfully completed programs at any time. Monthly notifications will be sent to participants notifying you of new courses available on the site.